[Elecraft] Remote operation of the K3 questions

Joe Subich, W4TV lists at subich.com
Sat Mar 9 12:32:15 EST 2013


> PS - Searching the Internet did not provide answers to my above
 > questions - possibly, the questions were not phrased properly!

The internet did not provide any answers to the above questions
because the configuration proposed is not feasible.  The P3
requires access via RS-232 to the K3 CAT commands and access via
the KXV3 or KXV3A to the receiver IF.  This means the P3 must be
collocated with the K3.  However, the display (and controls) is not 
"remoteable" nor is there a "slave" P3/0 equivalent to a K3/0.

There are, to the best of my knowledge, no off the shelf internet
remote operating systems that support the P3.

The standard solution for your needs - used my many many amateurs -
is to locate the equipment at the control point and use a large
diameter (7/8" or 1 5/8") hardline with a remote antenna switch
(generally with N+1 control lines where N=number of antenna ports).

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 3/9/2013 11:54 AM, Dick Diddams wrote:
>
>
> Twice I've written to K3 Support with no response - hence my assumption, 'my
> application can't be done'.  Also, my questions are most likely "outside"
> the charter of K3 Support and no response was provided.
>
>
>
> Reply directly to me, please doesn't clutter the Elecraft Digest with
> needless chatter. (dickdiddams at earthlink.net)
>
>
>
> The questions asked K3 Support:
>
> "Please recommend articles (manufacturers of hardware performing this
> application) connecting the K3, KPA500, P3 and KAT500 via cable over a
> distance of 200- to 250-ft?  My operation is 95% CW, 4% PSK and 1% SSB."
>
>
>
>
>
> "Recommend Application Note(s) available for operating a remote station
> operation via cable"
>
>
>
>
>
> "Usage of a UHF (1296 MHz as example) link is acceptable - but request
> direction where to locate articles."
>
>
>
>
>
> "Which is better hardware to use for this application, the K3/0, or a 2nd
> regular K3 operating in 'terminal mode'?"
>
>
>
>
>
> The reason for operating remote, is because the antenna will be located
> about 200-ft from the house.  The remote station is in an insulated climate
> controlled room (inside a barn).  The remote operating location has 100-amp
> 240-volt service.
>
>
>
> As a side note, (from your experience), is it simpler for one to use the
> Internet for this application - - - concern when using the Internet is able
> to have full CW break-in.  My normal operating speed is about 30 WPM and up
> to 40 WPM.  Not sure if there is a limitation on CW speed when operating
> remote.  If there is a limitation, what is the maximum CW speed one can use
> when operating remote?
>
>
>
> My preference is to run a cable (or an UHF link) and not use the Internet
> for the remote operation.
>
>
>
> If the recommendation is a K3/0 as the preferred hardware to use for remote
> operation, are there "used" Remote Internet System readily available and
> what is a reasonable selling price? 70%, 60%, etc. of the original selling
> price?
>
>
>
> When you reply directly to me, and if we haven't had previous
> communications, your email will automatically be placed in a Junk Folder
> until it is retrieved and your address has been added to my Address Book.
> Approximately once each day, the "Junk Folder" will be viewed and your
> address will be added to the Address Book.
>
>
>
> Regards, Dick - W7QHE
>
> dickdiddams at earthlink.net
>
>
>
> PS - Searching the Internet did not provide answers to my above questions -
> possibly, the questions were not phrased properly!
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>


More information about the Elecraft mailing list