[Elecraft] K3 AGC values survey

Cady, Fred fcady at ece.montana.edu
Wed Dec 4 18:15:34 EST 2013


Good thinking Ian. I have a one track mind - CW contesting.  Mode and kind of operating is important too.
73,
Fred

Fred Cady
fcady at ieee dot org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian White [mailto:gm3sek at ifwtech.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 3:19 PM
> To: Cady, Fred; elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: RE: [Elecraft] K3 AGC values survey
>
> The K3 can become many different rigs for different people. The AGC
> characteristics are the most configurable of all, so the survey won't
> be
> meaningful without one more key question:
>
> * For what kind of operating?
>
>
> 73 from Ian GM3SEK
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-
> >bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Cady, Fred
> >Sent: 04 December 2013 21:28
> >To: 'elecraft at mailman.qth.net'
> >Subject: [Elecraft] K3 AGC values survey
> >
> >Hi All,
> >It's been a while since the K3 AGC operation was changed (about 4.51)
> so it
> >might be fun to see what everybody has settled down on using.  It you
> want
> >to reply here or to me off line, I'll compile the result and post
> them.
> >My numbers are:
> >AF LIM 20 (probably a little high)
> >THR 12 (about S5)
> >SLP 0 (best slope)
> >DCY Soft
> >HLD 0.3
> >PLS NOR
> >AGC-F 120
> >AGC-S 20
> >
> >Thanks and 73,
> >Fred KE7X
> >



More information about the Elecraft mailing list