[Elecraft] why mix rf connector types within the product line?

[Tim Hague]

As soon as everyone standardises on N types the better, easy to make, splash proof, constant impedance, easily available, industry standard, rugged, it's a no brainer...

Best regards, Tim Hague
Skype m0afj.Tim
Sent on my iPad


On 27 Apr 2013, at 00:50, Don Wilhelm <w3fpr at embarqmail.com> wrote:

> Jeff,
> 
> There are a number of amateurs who just do not like BNC connectors and will not use them.  In fact I have heard some comment when looking at a K2/10 say "That antenna connector MUST be changed to a UHF type".  While I do not agree, it is a perception that must be dealt with at Elecraft.  Couple that with the fact that BNC is largely the 'standard' for QRP transceivers, but not for 100 watt and over rigs where the UHF connector reigns supreme.
> 
> Adapters are not a problem IMHO, they can just stay on the SO-239 jack and usually do not get in the way.
> 
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
> 
> On 4/26/2013 7:36 PM, Jeff Herr wrote:
>> I will end up taking the units (kx3 and that nice amp) with me as I travel.
>> 
>> In effect now we are forced to need adapters.
>> 
>> Do you think BNC connection is not suitable from an engineering perspective?
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html