[Elecraft] K3 - Filter suggestions for new builder
Edward R Cole
kl7uw at acsalaska.net
Wed Sep 26 13:35:43 EDT 2012
I originally chose the 8-pole filters thinking the steeper skirts
would be useful should I ever take the radio into a dense RF
environment like it is in the lower-48 states. MY experience with CW
indicated 400-Hz was adequate as I could narrow this down with the
DSP filter. I chose the 2.8 KHz SSB filter and 13-KHz filter for FM
use with a VHF transverter.
One note is that changing filters on the main board requires removal
of the sub-Rx so probably good to figure out what you want from the
beginning. I installed a 2.8 and 13 KHz filter in my sub-Rx,
thinking I could get the full bandwidth in audio to use with
soundcards for SDR sw. But I learned that audio is limited to 4-KHz
regardless of IF filter so I ended up selling the extra 13-KHz filter.
I have thought of adding a 1.8 or 2.1 KHz filter for working tough
SSB signals. I do try running the DSP down to that bandwidth but
find that the DSP audio distortion sometimes is counterproductive to
hearing weak SSB. I do not have trouble with dense local QRM up here
in Alaska. I wonder if the roofing filters are easier to listen thru
than the DSP filter?
I did not install a second 400-Hz filter in the sub-Rx and that may
be an error when I start running dual-pol diversity reception for
CW-eme. At present, I only run diversity Rx in USB since I am
running JT-65 on 2m-eme. I am testing a new program called MAP65
which maps and decodes all JT65 signals in a 90-KHz window. This
covers 144.090-144.170 digital eme sub-band, nicely.
Someday it would be interesting to set up a crossed dipole on 20, 15
, or 10m and listen in diversity Rx. Crossed horizontal dipoles
actually sample different polarities of refracted HF. According to
KL7AJ all HF is converted to circular polarity upon refraction in the
ionosphere (see the recent article in QST by him).
73, Ed - KL7UW
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list