[Elecraft] K3 - getting a sub receiver - filter suggestions + dvr

Don Wilhelm w3fpr at embarqmail.com
Sat Nov 24 21:58:27 EST 2012


Joe,

The filter match or not match question does revolve around your decision 
about diversity mode.
How many times are you in QSO when QSB becomes a problem?  The answer to 
that question is the real decision point for a casual operator.  If your 
answer is that QSB is never or seldom a problem, then you do not need 
matched filters in the SubRX.

OTOH, if your answer is that "sometimes" or "frequently" you experience 
QSB on a signal that you deem important enough to complete the contact, 
then you need to consider filters that match those in the main K3.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 11/24/2012 12:31 PM, Joseph Carter wrote:
> Greeting all.
> Between my birthday and Christmas my wife has OK'd the purchase of the sub-receiver for my K3 (#6623).
> I have read the recommendations by Wayne on the order site and originally thought I would just duplicate the filters in the
> main receiver (2.7, 400, 200) as I do mostly CW and Data but I do enjoy casual  SSB also.
> I note form Frank Cady's book that the primary reason for having the filters the same is diversity reception and that do not need to be the same.
> Right now finances only allow 2 additional filters.
> So I have been giving it some thought - would it be reasonable to put say a 1,0 filter and a 2.1 filter in the sub or perhaps match the 400 and add either a 1.0 or 2.1?
> I realize that my operating style influences this - I am not a contester  - just enjoy casual operating and some DX.
>
> The other issue would be adding the DVR - I was thinking of getting it just because it looks like it is easiest to install it at the time of the subreceiver addition though I am not sure how much I would use it and if I don't get it - I can probably add one more filter.
>
> "Found" Elecraft last Spring - now have K3 and KX3 and love them and this reflector.
> Thanks es 73
> de Joe, W9JC
>



More information about the Elecraft mailing list