[Elecraft] K3 Text Decoder

[Pete Lascell]

My experience with a MFJ pocket CW decoder seems to be more accurate and 
less delay than my K3.  But I'll be the first to say the K3 may not be 
adjusted correctly.

Pete  W4WWQ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Gilbert" <xdavid at cis-broadband.com>
To: <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 3:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Text Decoder


>
>
> Compared to what?  CW is difficult to decode, even when sent by
> machine.  What piece of software or equipment have you used that you
> thought worked better than the K3?
>
> RTTY decodes better by machine because that's what it was designed for.
> Morse code wasn't.  If you're disappointed in the K3 text decoder, the
> guy you probably want to complain to is long dead.
>
> Dave   AB7E
>
>
>
> On 5/25/2012 9:13 PM, John_N1JM wrote:
>> I'm a little disappointed in the text decoder for cw. It works fine for 
>> rtty.
>> Anyone got any comments about this?
>>
>> 73, John N1JM
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>