[Elecraft] "Bit image backup": "Safe sectors"
Brendan Minish
ei6iz.brendan at gmail.com
Tue May 22 18:52:16 EDT 2012
dd or dd_rescue copies of SSD's are fine and no problem.
The controllers hide all the fancy wear levelling stuff from the
computer and present a disk that to the OS looks just line any other
sata hard disk.
dd_rescue is a variant of the linux dd utility which can deal with disks
that ate not 100% healthy
see
http://www.garloff.de/kurt/linux/ddrescue/
you will find dd and dd_rescue along with a bunch of other useful tools
for copying partitions/disks on the knoppix distribution which is a
bootable 'live cd' or can be used from a USB stick
http://knoppix.net/
Trinity rescue kit is supposed to be very good too
http://trinityhome.org/Home/index.php?wpid=1&front_id=12
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 15:03 -0700, Jack Brindle wrote:
> John;
>
> Be very careful with a sector-by-sector backup utility if you decide
> to use an SSD. Solid State Drives constantly are moving sector
> locations around in order to avoid writing to the same flash location
> too many times. This occurs whenever a file needs to be updated or
> rewritten, and is especially true of the directory sectors. Because of
> this a backup may catch a file relocation in mid move, or more often
> catch a directory update while it is being moved, The result will be a
> completely useless backup. We discovered this recently when a friend
> needed to restore his system from a backup.
>
> The answer is to use a normal file-oriented backup instead of a sector-
> by-sector backup. Those backups are very much useful when needed. With
> the trend to replace disks with SSDs, especially in laptops, this will
> become very important.
>
> For those wondering, TIme Machine is indeed a file backup and not
> sector-by-sector. I recommend it whole heartedly!
>
> Jack Brindle, W6FB
>
>
> On May 22, 2012, at 11:22 AM, John Ragle wrote:
>
> > Hi, Jim...
> >
> > There are several programs that make literal copies (mirror
> > copies)
> > of disk contents. This includes the OS and all program files as well
> > as
> > data...
> >
> > I happen to have been using one called "Macrium Reflect
> > Professional" for the last few years. It produces a bit-for-bit
> > literal
> > image (a mirror copy) of the TOTAL contents of one or more hard
> > drives,
> > and can re-load such images. It does much more than copy data files.
> > At
> > present, I am using a PC with 2 inboard hard drives, each of 250 GB
> > capacity. One of these is my WIN7 Ultimate OS and associated files
> > (including programs, etc), and is about 80 GB in total content. The
> > second is my Ubuntu 11.10 OS and a somewhat smaller collection of
> > files
> > (including programs, etc.) I back up the former almost daily onto a
> > 1 TB
> > external USB hard drive, and somewhat less frequently onto a Sandisk
> > 64
> > GB stick...the 80 GB on the C:\ drive fit nicely onto the 64 GB stick
> > with the compression used by Macrium. The rate-determining step in
> > these
> > USB-based devices is the USB transfer rate itself; 80 GB takes about
> > 25
> > minutes to back or restore, and I do it last thing at night, letting
> > Macrium close down the PC when finished.
> >
> > If I had a third drive bay, I would probably choose to back up
> > onto
> > a third drive...hard drives have become so inexpensive that you can
> > practically use them like floppy drives. This would be significantly
> > faster, about 10-12 minutes for the 80 GB contents of C:\
> >
> > A while ago, I used a Sparc 20 with a shoebox tape drive and "DAT
> > Tapes," but that had little to do with my ham radio operation. These
> > were unsatisfactory because the error rate was significant. I also
> > tried
> > using an elderly PC as a network server at home on our LAN. That too
> > was
> > somewhat cumbersome. My wife is an active software developer (vide the
> > "OWL" system from Cengage), and separately uses a version of Macrium
> > onto a 1 TB external drive, but much of her work is stored on a
> > corporate "cloud," and hopefully backed up there as well.
> >
> > I do not have a high opinion of "Windows Restore" -- it is
> > significantly more involved to use than is Macrium Reflect.
> >
> > An advantage (to me the most significant one) of doing a bit-image
> > backup is that when it comes time to restore program files (i.e. .exe
> > files, etc), one does not have to search out the distribution media
> > and
> > play "baking cookies" with those media for hours to rebuild the
> > system.
> >
> > A disadvantage of doing a bit-image backup is that in the absence
> > of good "garbage collection" one keeps using the same general
> > structure
> > over and over again...a case can be made for rebuilding from scratch
> > (not from the bit image) on a regular basis...some have suggested
> > once a
> > year, at least.
> >
> > The Linux crowd can tell you of several useful Linux based
> > utilities for total backup, restore, partitioning, etc...I won't
> > enumerate them here, though many of them are very useful.
> >
> > In general, I don't favor running anything off the "cloud." My ISP
> > is sometimes down for 1 or more hours, and that mode of dis-operation
> > would leave me in the cold. Moreover, in view of the spate of
> > successful
> > hacking attacks, I don't trust cloud security. If I disconnect from
> > the
> > internet, the only ways someone can hack me are via my WiFi or to
> > physically break into my home. I have taken pains to barricade the
> > former. The latter takes care of itself in the usual way.
> >
> > Hope this answers your questions....
> >
> > John Ragle -- W1ZI
> >
> > =====
> >
> > On 5/22/2012 12:59 PM, James Robbins wrote:
> >> John,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Could you be more specific about your process for "bit image
> >> backup" and
> >> "safe sectors"? Program you use? What files you choose to
> >> backup? Whether
> >> Windows Restore program is or is not a suitable substitute? Thanks.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 73,
> >>
> >> Jim Robbins
> >>
> >> N1JR
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "It is vitally important to practice "safe sectors." A bit image
> >> backup
> >> takes only a few minutes, and can be made on an auxiliary hard
> >> drive or a
> >> jump drive."
> >>
> >> ______________________________________________________________
> >> Elecraft mailing list
> >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> >>
> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Sent from my lovely old Dell XPS 420
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > Elecraft mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
--
73
Brendan EI6IZ
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list