[Elecraft] MCU 4.51 NB

[Charles Johnson]

Same here. Lower level CW signals are much clearer and not nearly so mushy in crowded conditions. 

I received 4.50 but haven't received 4.51. Would like to try it out as well.

73, Charles, K4ZRJ


On May 12, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Ted Bryant wrote:

> Was v4.51 sent to the 4.50 testers?  If so, I missed it.
> 
> The major difference I've noticed with 4.50 is that cw signals, especially
> the low level ones, now seem much "cleaner".
> 
> 73, Ted W4NZ
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of W0MU Mike Fatchett
> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 11:22 AM
> To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] MCU 4.51 NB
> 
> 
> I did not mean to imply that the NB had changed from 4.50 to 4.51.  My
> comment was from 4.48 to 4.5X.
> 
> I can see how you read it differently though.
> 
> I have not noticed a change in the NB from .50 to .51
> 
> Mike W0MU
> 
> W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net
> 
> 
> On 5/12/2012 6:30 AM, Toby Pennington wrote:
>> Mike,  you could be correct.  This morning I seem to have a little
> distortion in the NB  which I did not notice before.  It's not bad,  but a
> little is there.
>> 
>> I may go back to 4.50 just to check it out.
>> 
>> Toby  W4CAk
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I just got it tonight.  I have not had much chance to compare but the NB
>> in 4.50 is much better!  A curious unexpected side effect!
>> 
>> Mike W0MU
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html