[Elecraft] KAF2 or KDSP2 for K2?

[Guy Olinger K2AV]

For serious contest use of the K2 on 160, I found that the extra skirt
depth afforded by the DSP was extremely useful when running as opposed to
search and pounce.  On the other hand the easy rolloff of audio off the
center frequency was useful.  Like some others what I really wanted was
BOTH.

73, Guy.

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:50 PM, David Pratt <david at g4dmp.fsnet.co.uk>wrote:

> Just my opinion having used both, Steve, but if you are primarily a CW
> operator I think you would be better off with the KAF2.
>
> 73 DE David G4DMP
>
> In a recent message, Stephen Roberts <steverob at shoreham.net> writes
> >Well going from a rather ancient Ten Tec to a K2 has been a real treat
> >for sure, and as most of us can't seem to be able to leave anything
> >well enough alone, I was thinking about possible options I can add
> >without breaking the bank. Can any of you folks tell me the real life
> >difference between these two options and whether or not either one of
> >them is worth the expense? I do almost no voice...all cw.
> --
>  + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +
>  | David M Pratt, Kippax, Leeds.   |
>  | Website: http://www.g4dmp.co.uk |
>  + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>