[Elecraft] KX3: use at <500-KHz
Dyarnes
w7aqk at cox.net
Sun Jul 8 12:51:35 EDT 2012
Hi All,
This issue seems to come up with just about every rig that offers general
coverage. I know it was a topic of discussion with the K3 when it first
arrived. It has always been my understanding that offering general coverage
on a ham rig meant compromise somewhere. Most of the earlier rigs that
started offering general coverage tended to compromise on the ham band
performance in order to accomplish the wide RX capability. That's why many
didn't even try to offer it. I think Elecraft's approach has been to offer
it, but without degrading the ham band performance, which means the wide
band stuff may be a bit lacking, particularly at the low end.
I've only checked the BC band performance on my KX3 once or twice, and just
to see if I heard much of anything! Actually, I could hear things pretty
well, but probably not like I would on a more specifically designed radio.
I also suspect the antenna I was using wasn't a very good match. Wayne's
explanation seems to at least make good sense to me, and I'm sure the
technical issues involved are real. Heck--just about every radio I own
drops off somewhere! I just want the least adverse effect to occur on the
ham bands. Also, I wonder what the internal ATU does (or is capable of
doing), if anything, when I tune down to the BC band. From a strictly
intuitive standpoint, I know that a lot of tuners tend to lose capability
below 80 meters, so I wonder if the KX3 ATU can/does even function at the BC
band. My guess is that it doesn't! You can't activate it down there, so I
don't know what's happening. Does that mean you really need an antenna that
is reasonably resonant at that frequency? I suspect there have been some
"tricks" applied to generate some sort of performance that low, but I really
don't expect much. Seems like we may be chasing ghosts to expect too much.
Dave W7AQK
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list