[Elecraft] K3/0

[drewko]

I think we can safely say that operating a remote mountaintop station
from the comfort of one's retirement home is nothing but a pipe dream
for most of us. The extent of my own remote operations is likely to be
from the far flung regions of my house. I'd be willing to pay about
150 bux for this added capability which, I guess, means it is bound to
remain a remote possibility.

73,
Drew
AF2Z

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:30:24 -0800, you wrote:

>On 1/16/2012 9:38 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:
>> This hobby really needs fewer intolerant and narrow minded old men ...
>
>I've missed this thread, which has obviously gone on for quite a while.  
>But I SURE DO AGREE with this statement, except that I would change one 
>word -- This WORLD really needs . . .  .
>
>I've operated from a Chicago city lot with wires and an S7 noise level, 
>from a couple of west coast super stations, from a damn nice station in 
>PJ4, and from my own station in Nor California that is getting to be 
>pretty nice.  I've run QRP in contests, and I've run legal power.  In 
>every situation I've had fun, but I've had the most fun in the stations 
>I've built myself (with considerable help from friends).  For a short 
>time I had a lease on a mountain-top QTH that I hoped to develop, 
>perhaps even remotely operated, but the realities of cost set in, and I 
>gave up the lease.  From experience, I can say that operating from a 
>mountaintop can be good for another 10dB or more on the HF bands, and 
>the noise levels are often quite low too.
>
>With all of this experience, I would be the LAST to begrudge a guy who 
>lives in the city, or in a small place where antennas are limited and/or 
>the nose is high, the opportunity to compete with a remote station he 
>has built himself -- indeed, I would applaud him for it! Anyone who 
>thinks it's easy should talk to some who has done it -- like K6VVA, a 
>serious contester and expeditioner who has been working on developing 
>his for nearly three years now. Remote control of a rig is a tiny 
>fraction of the problem, although in a remote site you may also have to 
>build the communications link (K6VVA did). There's also the matter of 
>building a shack, building a power system, building an antenna farm (and 
>it's seriously WINDY on mountain tops), building a switching system and 
>a control system for it, even building a road to get to it and buying 
>snow vehicles to get to it during contest season.
>
>As to cheating -- I include in that category a guy who starts working 
>DXCC at a QTH on one coast, then moves 2,000 - 3,000 miles (CO and NC, 
>or CA and NY), still within the US, and counts the QSOs he has made from 
>both locations for ANY award, including DXCC. or operates at a QTH 
>across the country to make a QSO that he adds to his award totals. 
>Anyone who has operated from locations 2,000 miles apart KNOWS in his 
>heart he's cheating, even if the stupid ARRL DXCC rules say it's OK. I 
>didn't start over when I moved from WV to OH to IL, because the 
>distances were short enough that it didn't change the difficulty of 
>working any given country, but I DID when I moved to CA.
>
>Like the man said -- it's between you and your conscience. And mine is 
>clean.
>
>73, Jim K9YC
>______________________________________________________________