[Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net cancellation
Ken
wa8jxm at gmail.com
Mon Feb 20 09:09:32 EST 2012
On Feb 20, 2012, at 8:11 AM, Brian Alsop wrote:
>
> 3) Rag chewing in the everyday world has gone the way of speeches vs
> tweets. So short exchanges are ingrained these days.
YMMV. My typical digital mode QSO is 30-60+ minutes. My CW contacts are typically 20-40 minutes.
I suspect that this is not a new phenomena, the RCC certificate has been around for many generations. I assume it originated to encourage more than just a contest type exchange.
>
> I really don't think the contest exchanges is any less meaningful that
> the brag tapes sent these day in the digital modes. Who cares about the
> other guy's dog's DNA.
I will agree with you there. I could care less about which subrelease of the O/S or application he is using.
As for contests, I have no problem with contests if they either:
1- were restricted to a portion of the band, allowing non contest people to share the band
2- were careful to avoid interfering with non-contest QSOs
Ken WA8JXM
>
> 73 DE Brian/K3KO
>
> On 2/20/2012 12:50, John Ragle wrote:
>> Since when do pre-programmed memory buttons and logging software
>> constitute "crisp operating practices?"
>>
>> In the case of actual public service, observing net protocol and careful
>> listening/transmitting are the important factors, along with
>> properly-prepared emergency hardware.
>>
>> I am not opposed to contests per se, but when the calendar is completely
>> dominated by this kind of activity, I think it is "out of control," as
>> N5GE observes.
>>
>> It is a pity that the Elecraft CW net had to be cancelled because QRM
>> from contests would have overwhelmed it.
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list