[Elecraft] Sherwood ranking

Gary Gregory garyvk4fd at gmail.com
Fri Aug 10 18:06:07 EDT 2012


*Barry,

Perhaps more to the point..How does the measurement from Sherwood relate to
real time performance and usability for the operator?

In what way does an operator detect a difference so small between say the
top 3 on the list?

Is the price differential worth buying say position one in the rankings
over a transceiver ranked at 2 or 3?

Whilst the ranking may be valid in the single measurement as shown, in the
real world the vast majority are unlikely to ever detect such a small
difference if all the top 3 ranked units were sitting in the shack side by
side etc.

I guess it comes down to which one looks the prettiest....:-)

Oh yeah, beauty IS in the eye of the beholder right? (I say this everyday
when looking in the mirror in the hope I don't scare myself too much)

Gary
*
On 11 August 2012 07:53, Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Buck k4ia wrote
> >
> > How is the ranking decided?  Is it subjective or is there a formula?
> >
>
> It's ranked by Rob's narrow spaced dynamic range measurement.
>
> Barry N1EU
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Sherwood-ranking-tp7560797p7560798.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>



-- 
*Gary*
*Start the day off slow, then taper off.........*


More information about the Elecraft mailing list