[Elecraft] K3 v. TS-590

[Paul Christensen]

One area where I think the TS-590 shines is in Kenwood's use of their long-established NR1 and NR2 algorithms -- still the best I've used in any transceiver.  Kenwood has used these two algorithms in the TS-2000, TS-480, and possibly a few others.  To me, NR2 on CW is more effective than using an APF filter, although it appears to be a form of combined noise-reduction and APF.  Whatever they're doing, the algorithms are very effective. 

Paul, W9AC

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: WILLIS COOKE 
  To: Paul Christensen ; elecraft at mailman.qth.net 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 10:46 AM
  Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 v. TS-590


  Very interesting report Paul!  I would have expected better from the TS-590.  I would be interested in a comparison between the TS-590 and the TS-480.  I own a K3, TS-480 and TS-850.  The K3 is my favorite by far, but it is not so superior to the TS-480 that I don't like the 480 for mobile where the split architecture is a big advantage for me.  I have not had the 480 long enough to completely evaluate it, but at least I don't throw rocks at it when I switch from the K3.  Some of my favorite things about the K3 are how well the QSK and VOX work.  I would not use either with the TS-850 because the relay made too much noise with QSK and the VOX setup was too touchy to use during contesting.  I used a foot switch with the TS-850 when contesting.  The K3 switching is so good that I don't hear anything at all when using QSK.  I also found by accident when I started using the K3 that semi-break in with a short delay is so much like QSK that it took me a while to realize that I was not operating QSK.

  I guess most of us never tire of singing the Elecraft praise about the very fine products.  Thanks Elecraft and Thanks Paul!

  Willis 'Cookie' Cooke 
  K5EWJ & Trustee N5BPS, USS Cavalla, USS Stewart

  From: Paul Christensen <w9ac at arrl.net>
  To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 9:12 AM
  Subject: [Elecraft] K3 v. TS-590

  Just picked up a TS-590 to evaluate against the K3 and ADAT ADT-200A.  First 
  impression is that build quality and panel layout is exceptional.  However, 
  things that do not bother other ops, bother me a lot.  For example, plugging 
  in headphones into the TS-590 results in audible hiss.  Activating 
  noise-cancellation on my Sennheiser headphones (to quiet down room noise), 
  results in even more hiss -- something that's not a problem with the K3.

  QSK:  It doesn't exist with the TS-590.  Sure, it's called Fast-Break-In, 
  but of all the Kenwoods I've tried (TS-950/850/870/2000/480/570), it's the 
  slowest of the bunch.  Audio between keyed elements is lost at about 15 WPM. 
  T/R switching is smooth, however.

  Strange IF/Audio DSP relationship.  In SSB mode, as the DSP is opened up 
  past 2.8K, the IF keeps opening, but the audio response stays relatively 
  fixed.  In other words, by opening up DSP, the audio response stays 
  relatively constant and only allows for more adjacent QRM.  I'll take the 
  adjacent QRM, but please open up the audio commensurate with the IF.

  I was going to add a Clifton Labs buffer amp to at least get a pan display 
  into my SDR-IQ on the down-conversion bands.  If the '590 didn't have these 
  fatal flaws, I would proceed. As it is, it's just not worth it to me. 
  Sorry, Jack.  I promise a another sale in the future!  Your product deserves 
  better.

  Paul, W9AC



  ______________________________________________________________
  Elecraft mailing list
  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
  Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net

  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
  Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html