[Elecraft] K3: Simple NR/NB feature suggestion
Charles Johnson
cbjk4zrj at gmail.com
Tue May 17 21:46:12 EDT 2011
Good suggestion. I like it.
73, Charlie, K4ZRJ
Sent from my MacBook Pro.
On May 17, 2011, at 4:43 PM, Tim Tucker wrote:
> I've followed the various discussions on how well the NR/NB works as
> compared to other rigs. I've used NR functionality in many different rigs,
> as well as just about every after market solution. In my area, the QRM
> makes NR/NB absolutely a necessity.
>
> Part of makes the NR & NB seem "easier" to use in other rigs (like Icoms) is
> that the setting is continually variable from least to most. The operator
> can tell when he's gotten too aggressive with it to suit his listening style
> and can easily back it down. As we all know, the K3 allows you to cycle
> through the various levels within an group setting and then you go through
> that cycle again with the next group setting (I think I said that correctly
> ;) )
>
> Here's my feature suggestion - For me, it seems that I am often trying to
> compare the amount of NR/NB applied between the major groupings. For
> example, when I operate SSB (which is most of the time), I may already know
> that I want just a little NR based on what I hear, but I want to hear the
> difference between 5-1, 6-1,7-1, and 8-1. But I can't do that without
> cycling through them all. Also, because I have to go from 5-1 to 5-2, 5-3,
> etc. before I get to 6-1, my ears have lost the reference point, which was
> 5-1. Same thing applies with NB settings. If we could have a menu button
> while in DSP adjustment that would rearrange the settings so they cycled
> through the groups at the same level setting first, I think it would be very
> powerful and very awesome! For the NR, you would need to preserve the
> groupings that are intended for CW/digital & voice. As I understand it,
> settings 1-1 through 4-4 are intended for CW/digital and 5-1 through 8-4 are
> intended for phone? Assuming my previous statement is correct, the new NR
> option, when activated would cycle like this:
> 1-1, 2-1, 3-1, 4-1, 1-2, 2-2, 3-2. 4-2, (etc), 5-1, 6-1, 7-1, 8-1, 5-2, 6-2,
> 7-2, 8-2, (etc.).
>
> The NB could have the same feature. It seems like it would be a fairly
> simple firmware feature addition without doing major changes to the actual
> NR/NB algorithms and also bridge the differences between an Icom like
> implementation and the Elecraft implementation. You should also be able to
> switch it easily back and forth between the two options. Does anybody else
> like this concept?
>
> Tim
> AE6LX
> www.worldwidedx.com
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list