[Elecraft] need some roofing filter advice?
Barry N1EU
barry.n1eu at gmail.com
Thu Jul 14 09:29:38 EDT 2011
Bill W4ZV wrote:
>
>
> Barry N1EU wrote:
>>
>> I disagree. I have switched to full-time use of 200hz 5-pole filters in
>> both receivers for cw, configured as 300hz bandwidth in CONFIG menu. My
>> width is typically set at 300hz. For contesting (running and S&P) and
>> 160M dx'ing, this works exceptionally well for me and I feel no need for
>> a wider cw roofing filter.
>>
> Yes and no. Perhaps in extremely crowded contests but maybe not for more
> casual operating or on sparsely populated bands.
>
For more casual operating or on sparsely populated bands, the 1.8Khz filters
do just fine for me. After all, it's 95% dsp.
I find the advantages of the narrow roofing filter greatly outweigh any
minor advantage of having a wider cw passband in contests. When running,
they protect me from offending neighbors who would have otherwise ran me off
my run freq, which occurs a few times in EVERY contest - far outweighs the
one or two off frequency callers I might have missed. And in S&P, the
narrow filters allow me to hear that weak signal right next to that s9+
running station and give me those dx mults in 160M contests.
I removed the 500hz filter pair that I used to also have installed.
Different strokes . . . .
73, Barry N1EU
--
View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/need-some-roofing-filter-advice-tp6581353p6583241.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list