[Elecraft] Why I bought a K3
Phil Hystad
phystad at mac.com
Thu Feb 24 21:57:05 EST 2011
I gave up my Icom 756 Pro III with its attached Icom PW-1 solid-state amplifier for my K3/100.
OK, I didn't really get rid of the Pro III and the PW-1, I still have them but they are not used very much. I usually turn it on once a month just to see if it still works.
When I first got my K3 kit put together I did a side by side test. I remember picking up a 40 meter CW signal on the K3. It was weak but very easily copied. So, I switched the antenna over to the Pro III to see how the signal sounded there. I was surprised, I could not find the signal. I turned back to the K3 and it was still there, easy copy. Turned back to the Pro III and this time I did lots of adjustment (preamp, fooling with RF gain, and other things) to bring in that signal. I did find it but could not copy it at all. I knew it was there and that was all.
That was my first test in comparing the Pro III to the K3. I did a few others and the K3 always performed better. There is one thing I like about the Pro III better. It sounds a little richer or deeper too me then the K3. But, I am mostly CW so that really does not matter that much.
73, phil, K7PEH
On Feb 24, 2011, at 2:59 PM, JERRY wrote:
> I am considering the purchase of a K3 but I am having trouble finding information justifying the expense for features the radio has over what I have now.
>
> I am looking for some input on advantages/features not found in the Icom Radios, IC-7800, IC-7700, IC-7600, or the 756 PRO III.
>
> With the exception of cost, has anyone given up their Icom for a K3?
>
> Jerry
> W6XI
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list