[Elecraft] XG2 Calibration Question

Stephen Prior sjp at sjprior.fsnet.co.uk
Thu Nov 18 14:01:06 EST 2010


The same experience here as James.  In my case the K3 was already pretty
accurate.  I wouldn't be without the XG2 though, it's good to have a source
of known power.

73 Stephen


On 18/11/2010 18:57, "James Sarte (K2QI)" <k2qi.nyc at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> I've only used the XG2 to calibrate the K3's S-meter.
> 
> No actual receiver improvements other than a slightly more accurate meter
> reading.
> 
> 73,
> James K2QI
> 
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:37 PM, larmar <larymartin at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> I was wondering how much of a difference calibrating the K3 using the XG2
>> vs
>> the default factory calibration would have on performance?  For those who
>> have used the signal generator, did you see any noticable improvement in
>> overall receiver performance?  Trying to decide whether the investment
>> would
>> be worth it.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Larry
>> KE5MO
>> K3/100 #4499
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/XG2-Calibration-Question-tp5752828p57528
>> 28.html
>> Sent from the [K3] mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> 
> 
> 






More information about the Elecraft mailing list