[Elecraft] OT: K440XV?
James Sarte
k2qi.nyc at gmail.com
Sat Nov 13 11:53:24 EST 2010
Hi Olli,
My primary interest would have been for 70cm FM, but I'm open to
experimentation. I'm still haven't ruled out purchasing the K144XV just for
that reason. A small log-periodic and a 160 watt mirage 2m amplifier might
be fun to play with.
Anyway, I guess I should say that it would have been nice if it was
possible to have 2m/70cm internal transverter, rather than just 2m alone.
My original question was more or less leading to that; what sort of
limitations exist in the K3's hardware that prevented such a module from
being designed in the first place?
73 de James K2QI
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Oliver "Olli" Dröse <droese at necg.de> wrote:
> James,
>
> if your only interest is 440 FM then a handheld or mobile TRX should be a
> much
> cheaper solution. ;-))
>
> Having fitted the K144XV in my K3 I would not see any available space
> anymore to
> also fit a 70 and/or 23 cm transverter inside, too. With all the options
> space
> is getting rare inside. ;-))
>
> And I don't think that lots of people would fit a "K440XV" instead of a
> K144XV
> inside meaning you have 160 - 6 m coverage plus 440 in one box but skipping
> 144
> MHz. Sure this is no good business model, at least to my mind. ;-))
>
> But maybe you would like to use Elecraft's external transverters which
> integrate
> nicely, i.e. besides the external box you completely control everything
> from the
> K3 itself including frequency display. Can it get any better? ;-))
>
> 73, Olli - DH8BQA
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
--
73 de James K2QI
President UNARC/4U1UN
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list