[Elecraft] Tunig increments could be better

[Wes Stewart]

Look in the manual about using CONFIG:VFO CRS.

--- On Fri, 3/19/10, John <john at t6ee.com> wrote:

> From: John <john at t6ee.com>
> Subject: [Elecraft] Tunig increments could be better
> To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> Date: Friday, March 19, 2010, 11:24 AM
> I love my K3 (#3271), but I have a
> question and I can't believe I'm alone. 
> You
>  seem to have missed the boat when it comes to tuning
> increments.  Thus, 
> why
>  is there no actual 'Fast' tuning in the second position of
> the fast 
> button?     Rather, while complimenting
> the cycle by cycle capability 
> provided in the 'Fine' second position of ten cycle tuning,
> 'Fast' then 
> enables tuning in
> one hundred cycle increments.  Why doesn't the fast
> position begin with
> hundred cycle increments and in its' second position
> provide tuning
>  increments of one thousand cycles?
> John Kountz, KE6GFF/T6EE
>  
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>