[Elecraft] OT: Transformer oil in DL's
Michael McShan
n5jky at me.com
Tue Mar 2 18:22:34 EST 2010
Well, to be fair, only the abstract is available online unless you
have a subscription to the International Journal of Toxicology, and so
you would have to get the full article to judge the methods. I'm on
campus at OU Medical Center and we don't have online access to this
journal. So, from only the abstract I can tell the following:
1. This was a study on a human kidney cell line, not rats.
2. Their measurements of toxicity were apoptosis and morphological
changes. Apoptosis is programmed cell death: exposure of cells to some
chemicals or toxins can trigger a suicide response so that they die
after a number of specific physiological changes. Kidney cells are
considered an important model system since you would like to avoid
apoptosis in your kidneys. :-) Apoptosis is often accompanied by
visible changes is the cells under the microscope.
3. Their main point was the differences in triggering apoptosis by two
different forms of PCB and the role of the enzyme caspase-3 in these
differences.
4. My guess is that the incubation periods were less than two weeks
and possibly less than one week, given that we are dealing with
cultured human cells.
It is not at all unusual for method details to be omitted from the
abstract in biological sciences: often journals have strict word
limits on abstracts. So, nothing is being hidden; you would just have
to get the full article. My interest would be to see: 1) the doses
used and whether these are relevant to known human occupational
exposures, and 2) whether the differences seen in the study were
significant statistically. Even then you gotta look carefully at the
results. As I tell my students, if something doubles your risk of
being run over by a bus from 1 in a million to 2 in a million, you
probably still will cross the street.
Finally, I'm a microbiologist and no expert on PCBs. However, I can
tell you that your risk of death is probably higher from exposure to
influenza.
72/73 and sorry for the dissertation on toxicology,
Mike N5JKY
On Mar 2, 2010, at 4:18 PM, Milt, N5IA wrote:
> And I have to totally agree with Ken. I have the same experience.
> Career 40+ years in power distribution.
>
> If you really want the "rest of the story", do a search on Google or
> other search engine for "Death of Humas by PCB Polychlorinated
> Biphenyl's". I don't think you will find anything.
>
> Feeding hundreds of times a normal "dose" of PCB to laboratory rats
> or a LOOOOONG time period showed the following: Quote
>
> "Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are among the most widespread and
> persistent pollutants in the global environment. Coplanar and
> noncoplanar PCBs have been shown to cause congener-specific
> apoptosis mediated neurotoxicity in rats.
>
> Very few, if any, such studies have been reported on human renal
> cell toxicity. The authors report here caspase-dependent or caspase-
> independent renal toxicity, as measured by apoptotic death induced
> by PCBs, depending on the planarity of congeners PCB-77 (coplanar)
> and PCB-153 (noncoplanar) in human kidney cells (HK2) in vitro. The
> authors have combined morphological and biological techniques to
> discover the relevance of apoptosis in renal proximal tubule cell
> death induced by these two PCB congeners. Treatment with both PCB
> congeners caused accelerated apoptosis in a time- and concentration-
> dependent manner.
>
> Based on our findings using human kidney (HK2) cells, there was more
> apoptosis-mediated loss of cell viability by non-ortho-substituted
> PCB-77 when compared to PCB-153. A significant increase of caspase-3
> expression through immunoblot studies showed the involvement of
> apoptosis by PCB-77 compared to none by PCB-153. The broad-spectrum
> caspase inhibitor z-VAD-fmk showed increased cell death when treated
> by PCB-153, but not by PCB-77, confirming that caspase inhibitor
> induced a switch in the mode of cell death. It is reasonable to
> assume that apoptotic cell death in the renal proximal tubule cells
> treated by PCBs may have both caspase-dependent and caspase-
> independent pathways."
>
> They don't quote the amount of TIME and the CONCENTRATION. I cannot
> find record of, and have never heard of, a human being suffering
> death or even sickness due to normal exposure to fluids containing
> PCBs.
>
> However, by the Stockholm Convention worldwide (2001) and the US
> Congress in the USA (1979), billions of dollars have been spent
> testing, labeling, replacing and buring or destroying power
> distribution equipment which were "contaminated" with but a few PPM
> of PCB in the dielectric fluids.
>
> The capacitors, transformers and oil which were removed from the
> distribution system which I worked for are now buried deep inside a
> rock mountain in Nevada at a great expense.
>
> And the fluids which replaced the PCB fluids cost a whole lot more
> and were less effective (less dielectric strength).
>
> Do your own research and draw your own conclusions regarding PCBs.
> YMMV.
>
> 73 de Milt, N5IA
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Kopp" <k0pp at rfwave.net>
> To: "Dave New, N8SBE" <n8sbe at arrl.net>; "Ken Nicely" <ken at nicelyweb.com
> >
> Cc: <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 12:44 PM
> Subject: [Elecraft] OT: Transformer oil in DL's
>
>
>> As a (retired) career power company employee I can say with
>> reasonable certainty that the "transformer oil" that was available
>> to --most-- scrounging hams since the introduction of the Cantenna
>> was -unlikely- to contain PCB's.
>>
>> At least in the circumstances familiar to me, PCB-containing
>> transformer oil was mostly long gone by the time the Cantenna
>> was introduced. It was certainly gone "as new" out of the barrel,
>> but did remain in transformers already in place, but few if any
>> hams received their oil from a transformer. (:-)
>>
>> It doesn't "make it right", but we had transformer shop employees
>> that literally stood chest deep in the stuff inside large substation
>> transformers when they were overhauled or a tap needed changed.
>>
>> 73! Ken Kopp - K0PP
>> ElecraftCovers at rfwave.net
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Michael McShan N5JKY
Oklahoma City, OK
n5jky at me.com
SKCC #85
FISTS #2626
QRP ARCI #9057
NAQCC #470
EM15fl
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list