[Elecraft] KREF3 External Reference Option: Detailed proposal
Eugene Balinski
eugeneb at nni.com
Mon Jun 14 22:08:16 EDT 2010
I should not type when tired. That should have read "this
is good", not goof.... sorry about that..
73
K1NR
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:04:31 -0400
"Eugene Balinski" <eugeneb at nni.com> wrote:
> 10 MHz is an industry standard. This is goof. However,
> you might want to consider a 1PPS GPS-trained input as
> well.
>
> 73,
> Gene K1NR
>
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:15:39 -0700
> Wayne Burdick <n6kr at elecraft.com> wrote:
> > There appears to be more demand for this than we
> thought,
> > so we're
> > looking into it again.
> >
> > Note that our planned external reference implementation
> > would not
> > require an exact 49.380000-MHz reference oscillator
> > signal. It also
> > doesn't require a pin-1 control voltage input on the
> TCXO
> > module
> > itself, as suggested earlier. It should work with any
> > existing K3
> > TCXO, either +/- 5 or +/- 1 PPM.
> >
> > If you're interested, here are the details:
> >
> > A new REF-lock module would be designed that plugs into
> > the small 8-
> > pin connector near the top of the KREF3 PCB. The user's
> > 10-MHz
> > reference signal would be routed from the rear panel to
> > the TMP
> > connector on the KRE3 (this connector faces forward,
> into
> > the DSP/
> > front panel area).
> >
> > A microcontroller on the REF-lock module would be
> clocked
> > by the 10-
> > MHz reference. If the signal were present, the
> > microcontroller would
> > continuously measure (and average) the frequency of the
> > 49.38 MHz
> > oscillator, obtaining a value to the nearest 1 Hz.
> > Hysteresis would be
> > applied to prevent "hunting," so the actual accuracy
> spec
> > would
> > probably be +/- 2 Hz. This translates to about +/- 1 Hz
> > in operating
> > frequency on 20 m.
> >
> > Approximately once per second, the module would report
> > the actual
> > reference frequency to the K3's main MCU via a slow
> > digital data line
> > (labeled "100HZ" on the RF and KREF3 schematics). The
> > main MCU would
> > use this to calibrate the REF CAL value normally
> entered
> > by the user.
> > There would be no noticeable impact on performance.
> >
> > If the 10 MHz external signal were not present, the
> > user's normal REF
> > CAL value would be used.
> >
> > Let me know if you have thoughts on this
> implementation.
> >
> > 73,
> > Wayne
> > N6KR
> >
> >
>
______________________________________________________________
> > Elecraft mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list:
> > http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Web mail provided by NuNet, Inc. The Premier National
> provider.
> http://www.nni.com/
>
______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list:
> http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web mail provided by NuNet, Inc. The Premier National provider.
http://www.nni.com/
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list