[Elecraft] MMTTY FSK
Kok Chen
chen at mac.com
Sat Jun 12 12:09:41 EDT 2010
On Jun 12, 2010, at 6/12 5:09 AM, Richard Ferch wrote:
> Brett Howard wrote:
>> I do see FSK as a method that is slightly less prone
>> to TX distortions.
>
> I have done some testing with a second
> receiver, and my K3's RTTY signal seems to be cleaner in AFSK than FSK
> (lower odd-order sidebands).
That is indeed correct. AFSK can potentially produce cleaner signals
than FSK, as long the transmit IMD is good. Take a look at the last
two figures on this page:
http://homepage.mac.com/chen/Technical/K3/Digital/digital.html
cocoaModem applies a filter to reduce the keying sidebands. Except
for having two tones, the result is similar to what Alex VE3NEA had
described in his CW keying experiments article in QEX a couple of
years ago.
The difference between FSK and AFSK can be even greater than what I'd
measured if the K3 transmitter were cleaner. Waveshaping the keying
signal created albeit small, temporal overlap between the two RTTY
tones, whereas an unwaveshaped FSK signal has no overlap and can be
used even with class C amplifiers.
You can indeed see the low level IMD spikes from the in the last
screen capture.
73
Chen, W7AY
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list