[Elecraft] K3. 2.7 or 2.8 filter?
goldtr8 at charter.net
goldtr8 at charter.net
Sun Dec 19 12:53:17 EST 2010
After having the k3 for a month now I can say that if you get the 1.8
for SSB with the 2.7 you will be fine.
I got the 2.1 and I always seem to droop to 1.8 or less due to band
conditioins so i wish i would have gotten the 1.8.
I will be getting the other filters for AM and FM when $$$ permitt.
Don
KD8NNU
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Dick Dievendorff wrote:
> I think you'll be quite happy with the 2.7 kHz standard filter. If you
> plan to use diversity in the future, you may prefer to get a matching
> offset filter in your second Rx.
> 73 de Dick, K6KR
>
> On Dec 19, 2010, at 8:17, Mike Rodgers <mikerodgerske5gbc at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I finally able to order myself a k3 on Monday. I will probally never
>> get the sub receiver. Will there be any noticeble advantage on ssb to
>> get the 2.8 with 8 poles? I will be getting the 1.8 as well. Thanks
>> and cc me as well if possible as I get the list as daily digest.
>> I saw it on the radio!
>>
>> Happy QSO'ing. Mike R
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list