[Elecraft] K3. 2.7 or 2.8 filter?

goldtr8 at charter.net goldtr8 at charter.net
Sun Dec 19 12:53:17 EST 2010


After having the k3 for a month now I can say that if you get the 1.8 
for SSB with the 2.7 you will be fine.

I got the 2.1 and I always seem to droop to 1.8 or less due to band 
conditioins so i wish i would have gotten the 1.8.

I will be getting the other filters for AM and FM when $$$ permitt.

Don
KD8NNU


On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Dick Dievendorff wrote:

> I think you'll be quite happy with the 2.7 kHz standard filter. If you 
> plan to use diversity in the future, you may prefer to get a matching 
> offset filter in your second Rx.
> 73 de Dick, K6KR
>
> On Dec 19, 2010, at 8:17, Mike Rodgers <mikerodgerske5gbc at yahoo.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> I finally able to order myself a k3 on Monday. I will probally never 
>> get the sub receiver. Will there be any noticeble advantage on ssb to 
>> get the 2.8 with 8 poles? I will be getting the 1.8 as well. Thanks 
>> and cc me as well if possible as I get the list as daily digest.
>> I saw it on the radio!
>>
>> Happy QSO'ing.      Mike R
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


More information about the Elecraft mailing list