[Elecraft] Fwd: An AGC Story
Bob Henderson
bob at 5b4agn.net
Sun Dec 12 09:56:17 EST 2010
Sorry Geoff.
My setup is fairly basic but I believe quite adequate. I use two +10dBm low
noise xtal oscillators operated within the 40m band. The output of each is
attenuated 20dB before combining via a Minicircuits SCP-2-1. Thereafter the
signals pass through an 8MHz LPF to a step attenuator. The SCP-2-1 provides
around 33dB port to port isolation at 7MHz. Isolation between the
oscillator output stages is therefore around 73dB.
73 Bob, 5B4AGN
On 12 December 2010 10:04, Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Thank you, Bob.
>
> But you have robbed Geoff of his favorite whipping boy. We will have
> to take Geoff out to a pub and help him drown his sorrows.
>
> What was your setup?
>
> 73, Guy
>
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Bob Henderson <bob at 5b4agn.net> wrote:
> > Bottom posted for context.
> >
> > Geoff GM4ESD wrote
> >
> > "If I had a K3, before I changed the HAGC threshold my *first*
> > measurement would be to look at the output of the SA612 mixer (with a
> > spectrum analyser) while introducing two or more very close spaced
> > signals into the antenna port, so that these signals do get through
> > the roofer - as in a pileup. The objective, of course, would be to
> > obtain an acceptably clean output from the mixer with non intrusive
> > products over a wide range of input levels. IMHO the higher the
> > HAGC's threshold can be the better, provided its control is tight
> > enough when activated to protect all what follows."
> >
> >
> > I made within DSP b/w IMD measurements on my K3 and comparable
> > measurements on my K2. These were included in a post dated 5 December
> > but you may have missed it.
> >
> > The following measurements relate to K3 S/N 4904 on 7MHz with 2.7kHz
> > roofing filter and 2.7kHz DSP b/w. Default slow AGC was selected.
> > The table shows input level at the K3 antenna connector for
> > each of two carriers spaced 500Hz. At each input level, the level of
> > the strongest IMD product observed at the AF output using an HP8568B is
> recorded
> > alongside.
> >
> > -73dBm Better than -55dBc (Input S9)
> > -63dBm -55dBc
> > -53dBm -50dBc
> > -42dBm -45dBc
> > -33dBm -42dBc
> > -23dBm -37dBc (Input S9+50)
> >
> > These figures are good and IMHO entirely acceptable. Some older
> > transceivers would struggle to provide -35dBc at S9.
> >
> > I made a similar set of measurements with my old K2 S/N 997
> >
> > -73dBm -50dBc
> > -63dBm -48dBc
> > -53dBm -45dBc
> > -43dBm -48dBc
> > -33dBm -45dBc
> > -23dBm -15dBc
> >
> > Broadly speaking the K3 is as good or better than the K2, which is
> > itself good. It is possible later mods to the K2 may have made it even
> > better. The most recent mods to my K2 were carried out over 5 years ago.
> >
> > 73 Bob, 5B4AGN
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > Elecraft mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >
>
>
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list