[Elecraft] CW Bandwidth (was: K3 transmitt filter)
lyle johnson
kk7p at wavecable.com
Sat Dec 4 15:06:16 EST 2010
Look at the Tx spectrum plots of radios tested by ARRL.
CW signals defintely occupy bandwidth! If they didn't,
we could do CW contests in a 10 Hz slice of each band and
accommodate every Amateur on earth with no QRM! And have
essentially 10 Hz left over!
In fact, a CW signal might have no width if you never
keyed it. The "C" in CW. But in fact we turn the carrier
on and off, and this creates sidebands. If the signal
on/off keying is properly shaped, these sidebands will
occupy little spectrum. And, if you think about it, the
total occupied spectrum width will be very nearly the same
no matter your keying speed up to the limit allowed by the
"waveshaping." If the waveshaping, for example, is a
raised cosine and you key it at a rate such that an
element just allows the complete waveshaping to occur, you
will have a 100% modulated AM signal.
So, if the waveshaping were, say, a raised cosine of 5
msec, and you keyed on for 5 msec, then off for 5 msec,
then on... you'd be generating a AM signal 100% modulated
with a 100 Hz tone. You occupied bandwidth would then be
200 Hz. Thus, to a first approximation, 5 msec
waveshaping will result in a signal at least 200 Hz wide.
As you reduce the keying speed (increase the length of
the elements, or the "dwell time" for carrier on and
carrier off, the energy in the sidebands will be reduced
and the energy in the carrier will be increased. But the
signal will still "occupy" 200 Hz of spectrum.
You can get narrow spectrum at these lower keying rates by
doing more complex waveshaping, but in the extreme (look
at a sinc function) you'd need to modulate the carrier
BEFORE the key is closed and for a similar amount of time
AFTER the key is opened. This translates to latency,
since the DSP can't look ahead in time to see what you
will be doing in the future (if it could, I'd apply THAT
signal processing algorithm to the stock market!).
We're restricted to filtering that attempts to minimize
occupied bandwidth while operating with absolute minimum
delays/latencies. We CAN apply this sort of waveshaping
to other digital data modes -- see, for example, James
Miller, G3RUH, classic article on "The Shape of Bits to
Come" <
URL:http://www.amsat.org/amsat/articles/g3ruh/108.html >
and think about CW rather than PSK while reading it.
We'll never get to zero bandwidth if we want to convey
information. I suppose if Shannon hadn't written his
paper, we'd be able to communicate with zero bandwidth,
but he did and now we can't... :-)
Enjoy!
73,
Lyle KK7P
> ... a CW signal has no width,
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list