[Elecraft] NEW TO THE LIST [P3 vs. LP-Pan]
Jim Brown
jim at audiosystemsgroup.com
Mon Aug 23 12:00:53 EDT 2010
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 15:57:12 -0700, Wayne Burdick wrote:
>The LP-Pan uses a PC for its display.
I've owned and used an LP-Pan for a while. I liked it, the software
associated with LP-Pan burns a lot of computer resources, and so does my
contest logging software. With both running, there's not much left for
the computer to send voice messages, etc. And, I had to reorganize my
operating desk to find room for a computer monitor for the display. The
existing computer screen (a laptop) was already full to overflowing with
my contest logging software.
When the P3 was introduced, I immediately ordered two, one for each of my
K3s that work in an SO2R (single-operator-two-radio) contesting setup.
Why did I do that? For the reasons noted above, and because the combined
cost of a computer, LP-Pan, and high quality, broadband audio sound card
comes pretty close to the cost of a P3 (in kit form). And I would have
two extra computer monitors to find room for on my operating desk, which
is already full to overflowing.
I received the P3s a week or so ago, and am pleased. Took less than an
hour to build each of them. I'm also working on a short list of software
suggestions for the design team. :)
73, Jim K9YC
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list