[Elecraft] Big Box K-3
Nicholas Farrar
nfarrar at bfpacs.com
Tue Aug 10 09:31:32 EDT 2010
My thoughts exactly. I has hoping for a calm productive discussion. I agree
with Buck, ideally all of these components would weight the same or less
than they do now. Marketing this GREAT radio to a new radiance that want
that big box all in one radio. Like the guys that buy DX-9000s and IC-7800s.
10-12,000 pop! I think those users would be happier with a big box K3 and
they dont even know it. But they refuse to look at the K3 because they want
the band scope built in or some thing else.
So, I've said more than my peace. Elecraft if you ever build a larger case
count me In.
--
Nicholas W. Farrar
Network Engineer / IT Coordinator
Brown Folse PACS
nfarrar at bfpacs.com
Office 318-595-0451
Mobile 318-381-9863
Fax 866-248-6128
From: K4IA at aol.com
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Big Box K-3
To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net
Message-ID: <7afb5.4e6358a.39922fa8 at aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Maybe naming the thread "Big Box K3" was a mistake. I should have called
it the K3Pro or + or Field.
The idea was to explore what might happen if a K3+ included a built in
power supply, amplifier, P3, speaker etc. And as a result of the bigger
box,
larger knobs and buttons. It's the same great radio packaged to a
different concept to appeal to different users.
I don't think a K3+ equipped as described would weigh one ounce more than
4 or 5 discreet boxes containing the same components. It would probably
weigh less and take up less room.
Now, I'm sorry I brought it up. No good deed goes unpunished.
k4ia
"Buck"
Fredericksburg, VA
K3 #101
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list