[Elecraft] K3 SWR Accuracy - reprise
Wes Stewart
n7ws at yahoo.com
Wed Nov 4 19:24:25 EST 2009
You have something terribly wrong. Two feet of coax at 7 MHz is negligible (~8 electrical degrees for solid dielectrics), even if its impedance is wildly different from 50 ohm.
Furthermore, any loss in the cable should reduce the SWR, not increase it.
--- On Wed, 11/4/09, Don Wilhelm <w3fpr at embarqmail.com> wrote:
From: Don Wilhelm <w3fpr at embarqmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 SWR Accuracy - reprise
To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net
Cc: "Phil & Debbie Salas" <dpsalas at tx.rr.com>
Date: Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 4:33 PM
I can vouch for Eric's statement. I routinely calibrate KPA100
wattmeters for SWR using a precision 100 ohm dummy load (which should
produce a 2.0 SWR). At 40 meters, I get 2.0 if I use a direct
connection with a male to male adapter, with a 1 foot coax, it shows
SWR=2.1 and with a 2 foot coax, it indicates SWR=2.2. The coax length
is NOT negligible.
BTW - my MFJ-259B shows the same thing with those same cable lengths.
The Smith Chart constant SWR circle is for ideal (theoretical)
conditions, and the real world conditions of cable loss and RF in places
the Smith Chart does not consider must be factored in to explain
phenomenon like this.
Since most instrumentation is balanced/calibrated for 50 ohms, things
agree when the impedance is 50 ohms resistive, but away from that point,
other factors come into play.
73,
Don W3FPR
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list