[Elecraft] To those that have the K2 and K3
Gary D Krause
n7hts at bresnan.net
Wed Nov 4 15:14:14 EST 2009
Wow, that's the first time I've done that to my own call sign. Thanks for the
input Jack. A K3 just may be in my future yet.
Gary, N7HTS
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:05:00 -0800
Jack Brindle <jackbrindle at earthlink.net> wrote:
> Gary;
>
> I have both. The K2 now serves as a backup to the K3, but I also use it for
>development work, so I probably don't count in the overall statistics. I
>plan on giving the K2 to my son (KG6YMN) when he goes to college in a year
>or so. That way he will have to work a bit harder to ask me to send money
>(rather than just picking up the phone)...
>
> I was very skeptical about the K3 receiver being better. Wayne kept
> assuring me it was. Then I got my K3, and discovered the truth. It is way
>better. There are several things. In contests it simply does not crunch,
>even when someone is relatively close by (both frequency and distance). The
>filters allow me to block folks out when I need to, but mostly they allow me
>to reduce the excess noise that tends to give me a headache. I can eliminate
>the super lows to get rid of rumble, and the highs that are just pure noise.
>And when there is a signal up there that bothers me, I just close the
>bandpass down a bit and get rid of it. I wish I could do that on the K2, but
>the DSP just doesn't have the capability. I found the noise blanker to be
>better on the K2 for getting rid of power-line noise, but an update from
>Lyle about three months ago changed this. The K3 now does a very good job.
>Of course it has many more settings for the _two_ noise blankers (one in
> hardware, the other in DSP), and you have to play with it to get a good
>feel for what is going on. I tend not to use the noise reduction, and
>several other things simply because they require more thought power than I
>am willing to give them on most days to figure them out. In that vein, some
>time ago I was playing with the auto-notch function on SSB (it works pretty
>well), then changed to CW. I couldn't understand why I couldn't copy any CW
>signals for a little while. I believe Wayne has fixed the software so it
>turns off the auto-notch in CW. Better to actually hear CW signals that way.
>
> The K2 sat on my workbench for a while, but it was too lonely. So I moved
>it back to the operating bench (where I do most of my development work
>anyway) where it looks quite nice next to the K3. And I actually use it from
>time to time (usually for testing KRC2 issues and the like).
>
> By the way, I see I'm not the only one who tends to type two letters
> backwards once in a while. But really, did you have to bust your own call?
>;-)
>
> 73!
>
> Jack Brindle, W6FB
>
>
> On Nov 4, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Gary D Krause wrote:
>
>> Why do you still have both? The K2 is my main station rig. I
>> recently
>> considered buying a K3 and even went to the Elecraft web site to
>> order it.
>> Each time I backed off so that I could think more about it. In the
>> end, I
>> decided to add a couple of options to my K2. I could still order a
>> K3 if I
>> want but, I'm afraid my K2 would just sit and gather dust. I don't
>> want to
>> sell it after spending all that time putting it together including the
>> options. I see comments that the reciever is so much better on the K3
>> compared to the K2. How much better? I don't know of anyone that
>> has a K3 to
>> listen to. I've watched and listened to the Youtube videos but, the
>> sound is
>> only as good as my pc speakers and the camera that recorded it so,
>> that's not
>> much to go by. The specs look better on the K3 compared to the K2
>> but, not by
>> much. For the kind of operating I do, the K2 is great. The K3 is
>> always
>> there in the back of my mind, though. In some respects, the K3
>> really sucks!
>> ;-)
>>
>> Gary, N7THS
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list