[Elecraft] Your Opinion: The realities of QRP vs. QRO
Mike-WE0H
we0h at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 6 13:07:53 EST 2009
He had a wink after his 'QRP RULES!' statement. Winks, as in just
joking, giving you guys some crap, ha ha ha , hi hi hi...that sort of
thing. I seriously doubt anyone here is bashing or calling anyone out,
it's all fun, to each their own, don't push this or that upon someone
unless they ask, you know, be happy. Text emails don't show emotion, and
feelings don't get understood because of this. Tongue in cheek, smile,
it's Friday!!! Yea!!! hi hi...
73,
Mike
WE0H
Building my K2...almost done...
Bill W4ZV wrote:
> Gary D Krause wrote:
>
>> Just as long as we all keep it in perspective and
>> realize that QRP RULES! ;-)
>>
>>
>
> But QRP simply does NOT rule everywhere...
>
> ...for DXing on the low bands (80/160),
> ...for EME or meteor scatter on VHF,
> ...when propagation is marginal or atmospheric QRN is high,
> ...in emergency communications when a life depends on it.
>
> Sure QRP works well on the HF bands when conditions are good...it's a heck
> of a lot of fun to work across the world with a 2 Watt rig in an Altoids tin
> and a piece of wire...but please don't make blanket statements about "QRP
> ruling" for many activities...it simply doesn't.
>
> If QRPers want a REAL challenge, try working DXCC on 160m with 5 Watts.
>
> 73, Bill W4ZV (who loves both)
>
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list