[Elecraft] [K2] how much harder to build: K2 vs K1?

[Robert G. Strickland]

LS...

As others have said, it's one piece at a time, one solder joint at a 
time. From that perspective, the K1 and K2 are identical. Some will say 
that the K1 is "easier," but I think of it more as a "simpler radio," 
not a simpler construction project. Some fine joy in how much can be 
accomplished by so little, and the K1 is a great example of that idea. 
If you are really looking for something of the K2's functionality, then 
build it.

I built some Heathkits back in the 50's, but they were nothing like the 
modern [more or less] construction found in the K2, So, I was pretty 
much starting from scratch. I inventoried all the part, laying them out 
with Scotch Tape on heavy paper stock with everything marked. I found a 
great way to wind toroids. I bought a very good desk assembly vice with 
two type of clamps. I bought some very good - and inexpensive - 
magnifying goggles. All these incidentals contributed to a more or less 
error free assembly. I made some mistakes, but they were primarily goofy 
mistakes, not because there was anything "hard" going on.

If you would like, I can send you some pictures of the parts pages, the 
toroid winding method, and the desk assembly area. This would give you 
an idea of the prep phase. It took me about a month working a few hours 
a night, about every other night. It was great fun, one of the best 
experiences I've ever had in ham radio. I'd do it again in a flash.

The K2 is the main transceiver here. I've added all the modules 
including the 100w amp. They all work perfectly. As mentioned elsewhere, 
the reflector is great for support at all levels. A real community. Go 
for it!

...robert


lstavenhagen wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm considering building a K2, but here's my situation. I'd be a first-time
> kit builder, I've never had the opportunity to build and the K2 looks like
> it'd be great fun and a great learning experience. The K1 sounds like it's
> the better choice for a first-time build, but the K2 matches what I need in
> a radio a lot better.
> 
> So I guess my general question is, how much harder would a K2 be to build
> over a K1? I.e. what are the "gotchas" with the K2 for a novice builder that
> aren't in a K1?
> 
> I know this is kind of vague, but that's the only way I can think of to ask
> the question. I think I'd still do OK if I took my time and got good tools
> (I just ordered the recommended weller soldering station).
> 
> Thanks,
> LS
> W5QD 

-- 
Robert G. Strickland, PhD, ABPH - KE2WY
rcrgs at verizon.net
Syracuse, New York, USA