[Elecraft] Filters for K3?
AC6JA at aol.com
AC6JA at aol.com
Sun Dec 27 20:06:18 EST 2009
I have the 8-pole 2.8, 1.0, and 400 in both the main and sub receivers.
The only other one that I've been debating on is the AM filter. Otherwise
no regrets.
Mike AC6JA
K3 #03215
In a message dated 12/27/2009 4:27:25 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
tuner at zoominternet.net writes:
I have the 2.8/8-pole, the 1.8/8-pole and the 400/8-pole. So far I have
not felt the need for a narrower CW filter although I have not contested with
mine yet. I currently do not own the 2nd receiver.
73 Keith W8GX
On Dec 27, 2009, at 7:00 PM, Martin Schmiedel wrote:
> Elecrafters,
> i am about to order filters for my K3 and would like to hear from the
> group what filters i should go for.
> I am a ragchewer as well as a contester, ssb & cw. Rarely data modes.
> I do weak signal work on 160/80 cw.
> I have
> 2.8khz ssb in main & sub
> 400hz cw in main & sub
> Should i order the 200hz 5-pole filter for their narrower bandwith or
> the 250hz 8-pole with steeper skirts? Add 2.1khz or 1.8khz for ssb?
> What is your recommendation?
> Should i add filters for both rx's (-> diversity) ?
> If i go for the 5-pole filters,should they be matched by elecraft or is
> there a method to tweak it in the K3 ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Martin
>
> --
>
> 73, DM4iM
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list