[Elecraft] K3 vs. Rohde and Schwartz

[John King]

Interesting indeed. The comparison they quote is the IMD
dynamic range at 5 KHz spacing, which the R&S wins. But
take a look at the 2 KHz spacing - the K3 trounces the R&S.

73,
  john WA1ABI
  K3 #795


> -----Original Message-----
> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of John Klewer
> Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2008 11:43 AM
> To: 'Elecraft'
> Subject: [Elecraft] K3 vs. Rohde and Schwartz
> 
> 
> Interesting to note that in QST magazine's review of a super whizbang, 
> thermonuclear commercial transceiver from Rohde and Schwartz in the 
> October issue of QST, the receiver they referenced its intermod 
> performance to is.......the K3.
> 
> NICE!
> 
> John, N6AX
> K3 567
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    
> 
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>