[Elecraft] Bigger K3 S-meter
Joe Subich, W4TV
lists at microham-usa.com
Thu Oct 30 17:13:39 EST 2008
> Anyway, since you do external software for the K3, can you
> confirm that an S-meter displayed on the PC could get signal
> strength data from the K3 that has a fine enough granularity
> to show a change of 1 or 2 dB?
No. The SM; (and BG;) reports from the K3 are one S-unit
increments from S0 to S9 and 5 dB steps above S9.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of K7TV
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 6:02 PM
> To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Bigger K3 S-meter
>
>
>
> Julian,
>
> I tend to use S-meters more for purposes other than for
> giving signal reports, but when I do give a signal report I
> prefer to make it an honest one and update it later in the
> qso. When I get a non-real report of 599 e.g. from a dx, it
> kind of neutralizes the joy of having made the contact. I
> think Elecraft and TT (and in the past Collins) deserve
> credit for providing meaningful S-meter scales. I think the
> biggest problem today with the existing S-meter standard is
> that the same standard is applied to each HF/MF band, with an
> abrupt change for VHF. A separate S9 definition for each band
> would make more sense because of different average noise
> levels. Sometimes in the past I have gone by the standard for
> 40 and down, and deliberately inflated the readings on the
> higher bands by switching on the preamp consistently for
> those bands. Of course if one uses a separate receive
> antenna, one may need to adjust reports for that. Given all
> possible adjustments, one might want to be able to set a dB
> offset individually for each band, and I am sure that the K3
> could do that, although I would not push for it as a priority.
>
> Anyway, since you do external software for the K3, can you
> confirm that an S-meter displayed on the PC could get signal
> strength data from the K3 that has a fine enough granularity
> to show a change of 1 or 2 dB?
>
> Thanks,
> Erik K7TV
>
> Julian, G4ILO wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > K7TV wrote:
> >>
> >> Are you referring to the K3's ability to display audio
> output level
> >> in mV or "dbV"? While mere signal reports can reasonably
> be given by
> >> ear, I have measurement in my blood and really appreciate that K3
> >> capability.
> >>
> > I think signal reports are more politics or psychology than
> science.
> > If someone gives me 599 it's only good manners to send 599
> back. It's
> > just the way I was brought up. :) If they send something other than
> > 599 then I realise that they are actually giving me a real
> report, so
> > I try to give them a real one back. But since signals can
> often vary
> > from S7 to S9+20 over the period of a QSO I think the idea
> of giving
> > realistic signal reports is actually unachievable anyway.
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n2.nabble.com/Bigger-K3-S-meter-tp1399030p1400685.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list