[Elecraft] 6M Preamp
ab2tc
ab2tc at arrl.net
Thu Oct 23 20:12:31 EDT 2008
Hi all,
Personally I wish Elecraft had resisted the temptation to include the 6m
band in the K3. Grafting the 6m band, which is a VHF band, on to a HF
transceiver will always be a compromise at best and at worst it might affect
HF performance negatively. In my opinion ICOM made a good choice in their
low end transceivers (IC-718, IC-7200) to eliminate 6m and FM mode. Both
choices are generally unneeded by HF operators and both make good
engineering optimizations possible for the mainstream HF modes.
Knut - AB2TC
W7GJ, Lance wrote:
>
>
> Julian, G4ILO wrote:
>
>> I'm not saying that performance on six meters should have been higher
>> than
>> the performance on the HF bands. I'm saying that it should not be worse
>> than
>> an IC-756 PRO III, a TS-2000 or an FT-2000 would be, considering the
>> claims
>> made about the K3's performance.
>>
>> I have no idea of the proportion of K3 users who will never use 6 meters
>> in
>> any serious way. However I think there are quite a few, such as myself,
>> who
>> will have some fun on the band from time to time simply because modern HF
>> transceivers now include it. I'm certainly not serious enough about 6m to
>> spend money on a preamp for it, so I'm feeling a little short-changed
>> after
>> receiving information that the K3 is so deaf on 6m that you need one. The
>> other radios mentioned above certainly are usable on 6m without a preamp
>> by
>> all but the most diehard enthusiast who would probably want it at the
>> masthead anyway.
>>
>> -----
>> Julian, G4ILO. K2 #392 K3 #222.
>> http://www.g4ilo.com/ G4ILO's Shack http://www.ham-directory.com/ Ham
>> Directory http://www.g4ilo.com/kcomm.html KComm for Elecraft K2 and K3
>
> Hello Julian,
>
> Yes, other HF/6m transceivers such as the IC756 and IC746 are also
> relatively
> insensitive when it comes to 6m. I understand the typical HF/6m
> transceiver has a
> front end noise figure in the neighborhood of 5 or 6 dB on 6m and some are
> much
> worse. Part of the tradeoff for handling strong signals on 20m I suppose.
> For most
> strong signal applications it makes little difference.
>
> Putting a low noise preamp such as the one offered by Elecraft ahead of
> your receiver
> typically will give you a dB or so more sensitivity, provided you have low
> loss
> feedline. If you are using lossy old RG8 or RG58 then you might as well
> not bother
> with a preamp because if there was a weak signal there at the antenna, it
> will be
> gone at your rig anyway. For strong signal openings who cares about a dB
> or two?
> For weak signal contacts from a quiet QTH, that can make all the
> difference.
>
> It is great to have a rig like the K3 where you have an option. GL and VY
> 73, Lance
> --
> Lance Collister, W7GJ (ex: WN3GPL, WA3GPL, WA1JXN, WA1JXN/C6A, ZF2OC/ZF8)
> P.O. Box 73
> Frenchtown, MT 59834 USA
> QTH: DN27UB
> TEL: (406) 626-5728
> URL: http://www.bigskyspaces.com/w7gj
> 2m DXCC #11/6m DXCC #815
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>
-----
AB2TC - Knut
--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/6M-Preamp-tp1366337p1370384.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list