[Elecraft] sidetone range
Joe Subich, W4TV
lists at microham-usa.com
Wed Oct 1 15:30:01 EDT 2008
I don't know how high you want to go but B5 is within 3 Hz of
990 and E6 is within 2 Hz of 1320. In both cases the 2-3 Hz
is probably within the error of the reference.
At higher tones even 5 Hz (C6 = 1046.5, D6 = 1174.7) is probably
acceptable to all but the most highly trained ear since the
error is < .5%. I know that being able to use 520 Hz (C5=523.3
Hz) is far more natural than either 500 or 550 Hz.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
> -----Original Message-----
> From: O. Johns [mailto:ojohns at metacosmos.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 2:57 PM
> To: Joe Subich, W4TV
> Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] sidetone range
>
>
> Dear Joe,
>
> I do use 740Hz as a work-around. But, for me, the higher the
> better.
> From F#5 to A5 makes a difference. I'd go even higher than
> 880Hz if
> there were available consonant tones between 880 and 1000.
> But 880 is
> the highest possible with 10Hz increments, provided of course that
> Wayne and Lyle can be convinced to raise the bar above 800.
>
> 73,
> Oliver Johns
> W6ODJ
>
>
> On 30 Sep 2008, at 9:31 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Why not use 700 Hz - it's less that 2 Hz from F4 (698.45 Hz) ...
> > or 740 Hz (F#5 - 739.99 Hz)? 780 Hz is only 3.99 Hz from G5.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> >> [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of O. Johns
> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 9:34 PM
> >> To: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> >> Cc: wayne burdick
> >> Subject: [Elecraft] sidetone range
> >>
> >>
> >> Dear Wayne and Lyle,
> >>
> >> In the original specs for the K3
> >> (and even now in the Tech Specs page:
> >> <http://www.elecraft.com/K3/K3_specs.htm
> >>> )
> >> the sidetone range was, quote, "CW Offset/Sidetone: 300-1000 Hz,
> >> adjustable."
> >>
> >> But the newer manuals, and the K3 itself I presume, have the range
> >> limited to 300-800Hz. I wonder why this was changed? Was
> there some
> >> hardware or software reason, or did you just decide that no
> >> one would
> >> want a sidetone up to 1000Hz?
> >>
> >> Now most people may not need a sidetone above 800Hz, but I
> do. Here
> >> are my reasons:
> >>
> >> (1) I have a hearing loss at low frequencies. I know this is
> >> unusual, but it is so. It is hard for me to hear low pitches
> >> clearly. (I know the arguments about lower tones being easier to
> >> separate in a QRM situation, but, alas, that is of no use to me.)
> >> (2) I will be listening to that sidetone a lot, and would like to
> >> set it at some exact musical pitch so as to preserve what
> remains of
> >> my musical pitch sense. Now 440 is a perfect A4. But it is too
> >> low for
> >> me to hear. What I need is 880, a perfect A5. But this is above
> >> 800.
> >>
> >> Is there any chance that the upper limit could be moved back to
> >> 1000Hz, or at least to 900Hz so that it would include 880Hz?
> >>
> >> Thanks and 73,
> >> Oliver Johns
> >> W6ODJ
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Elecraft mailing list
> >> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> >> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> >> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> >> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> >>
> >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> >> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
> >
> >
>
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list