[Elecraft] K3: listening to both rcvrs
Joe Subich, W4TV
lists at microham-usa.com
Sun Nov 16 19:06:25 EST 2008
> So the reduction in SNR (assuming equal noise power) is
> 3.01 dB, not 6 dB.
That's the best case if the noise power is equal. If the
"other" receiver has higher noise power (wider bandwidth,
more interfering signals, etc.) the S/N reduction is greater.
Even 3 dB reduction in S/N is a big hit if the DX Station
you're trying to hear is at or just below the noise level.
It would be a shame to turn a top performing radio into a
mid-pack device by mixing the audio - because of some old
wife's tail. Let those who want mixing do it externally
so it doesn't impose a S/N penalty otherwise.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Kok Chen
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 5:10 PM
> To: Elecraft Reflector
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3: listening to both rcvrs
>
>
>
> On Nov 16, 2008, at 1:52 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
> > Assuming equal volume settings and equal bandwidths in the two
> > receivers, the S/N will degrade by 6 dB (twice the noise voltage).
>
> Unless the noise is correlated, the probability density
> function from
> summing two random variables causes variances (noise power), not the
> standard deviations (noise amplitude), to add. So the reduction in
> SNR (assuming equal noise power) is 3.01 dB, not 6 dB.
>
> 73
> Chen, W7AY
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list