[Elecraft] K3 RF Feedback Problem
Monty Shultes
montys at mindspring.com
Sun Nov 2 18:50:20 EST 2008
I bit the bullet and removed L4 and L7 this morning. It is not difficult;
they are both on the back of the front panel board. I jumpered the pads
with wire. I am now getting superb audio reports from critical local
stations that were guiding me in reducing RF on my audio. My MC-60 mic is
back in good graces.
It works.
Monty K2DLJ
> Even in balanced audio systems, the same rules apply. Had the K3 been
> designed with a truly balanced, 3-stage instrumentation input for its mic
> pre-amp, the inclusion of L4 and L7 on the shielded return paths would
> have the same effect. The saving grace in an instrumentation-input
> circuit (or in the alternative, an audio transformer input) is the
> inherently large common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR) across a very broad
> frequency span that limits the presence of RF on a twisted-pair audio
> line, even in the total absence of the cable shielding. For nearly 100
> years, the Bell System and its progeny have used unshielded twisted-pair
> balanced audio systems in the presence of outrageously-high RF fields with
> no measurable detriment to performance in many instances.
>
> Paul, W9AC
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list