[Elecraft] K3 - ESSB Availability

[n4lq]

Oh here we go again....Stop trolling for flames guys. Now we will start this 
same old argument again. If one is so concerned about how much bandwidth 
they use then switch to QRP CW and forget about SSB.
Steve Ellington
N4LQ at insightbb.com
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Tippett" <btippett at alum.mit.edu>
To: <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 10:24 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 - ESSB Availability


> Every time I see the term ESSB I see red.  I wonder if these folks
> have ever read FCC Part 97.307 (a) Emission Standards:
>
> (a) No amateur station transmission shall occupy more bandwidth than
> necessary for the information rate and emission type being
> transmitted, in accordance with good amateur practice.
>
> http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/news/part97/
>
> Instead of playing wannabe broadcast engineer, why don't these folks
> try something really creative, like trying to see how *little*
> bandwidth they can use to communicate, instead of how much bandwidth
> they can consume?
>
> Icom has a lot of faults (like very misleading advertising) but I do
> commend them for limiting the bandwidth of their voice modes.
> End of rant.
>
> 73,  Bill  W4ZV
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 269.24.3/1472 - Release Date: 5/29/2008 
7:27 AM