[Elecraft] K3 BETA FIRMWARE RELEASE -- MCU rev 1.94

[Windy Dankoff KM5Q]

I'm getting the same result as Bob. No matter how I set the threshold, 2,3,
Automatic, etc, I cannot get it to perform as well as the old 1.78 version
which was just amazing.

Windy KM5Q



Well, I have, and found that the lower the threshold, the less stable.
Using the beta version, with THR = 2 excursions of 20 Hz between
auto-spot invocations are not uncommon - yet on the same signal (S5 or
so) the 1.78 version performs very well. The side by side comparison
with two rigs using the same signal is telling. I'll play with it a
bit more this evening.

Bob NW8L

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV
<lists at microham-usa.com> wrote:
>
> Bob,
>
> Try setting the threshold to 2 or 3 (CWT Hold).  With a fixed
> threshold, it seems very close to the previous performance on
> all but the strongest signals (and even the old FW was a bit
> touchy with S9+20 signals).
>
> 73,
>
>   ... Joe, W4TV
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/K3-BETA-FIRMWARE-RELEASE----MCU-rev-1.94-tp17199166p17215426.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.