[Elecraft] K3 6m pre-amp
K3KO
alsopb at nc.rr.com
Mon Mar 24 10:56:03 EST 2008
Dave,
If I do the conversion to microvolts, it indicates 0.8 microvolts for no
preamp and 0.04 microvolts for a preamp (I think the column headings are
reversed) I believe MDS is a 3db s/n ratio.
For comparison.
My IC706IIG has the following 50MHz specs 0.12 microvolts for 10 db s/n
ratio. Filter unspecificed, mode SSB/CW, preamp on. My guess it is the
stock (2.7KHz?) filter What it really measures, I don't know.
I know why they didn't use the narrower available CW filters for the ICOM
specs. The 300Hz filter has a lot of uncompensated for loss. So much so I
can't use it on 6M CW for any weak signal work.
All that aside. Trying to put the two on an equal footing. Say 400Hz, 3db
S/N indicates the 706 would come in at about (preamp on, 400Hz lossless
filter, 3db S/N) yields -131 dbm (if I did the math right)
One thing for sure, one can't compare S-meter readings from rig to rig. It
has to be some kind of measurement with attenuators or lab equipment- - like
you did with the lab generator.
What are the 480 specs on 6M?
I do disagree with a CW op not being able to copy a signal with a 3db s/n
ratio. In fact, decent operators can copy CW signals several db below the
noise.
73 de Brian/K3KO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hallo,
> I can't see any comment made by the BCC re the 6m sensitivity, only
> Wayne's response.
I am working on the translation of a much delayed update of the BCC report.
In the mean time we have done MDS measurements for various bands:
-----------------------------------------
Band w Preamp w/o Preamp
160m -129dBm -137dBm
80m -133dBm -138dBm
40m -133dBm -138dBm
20m -134dBm -138dBm
15m -132dBm -137dBm
10m -130dBm -137dBm
6m -129dBm -134dBm
Table 2: MDS of the K3 at 400Hz
-----------------------------------------
vy 73 de toby
--
DD5FZ (ex 4n6fz, dj7mgq, dg5mgq, dd5fz)
Dave G4AON wrote:
>
> I've just done an A/B comparison between my K3 and my Kenwood TS-480SAT.
> I had the pre-amp switched on in both transceivers. On the 480 I was
> able to comfortably hear a signal from my signal generator some 10 dB
> lower in level on the 480 than I could on the K3, which is quite a
> difference.
>
> I think the often quoted MDS (minimum discernible signal) makes the
> specification appear "better" than it really is and is not realistic.
> MDS is a measure of the signal that increases the output of the receiver
> by 3 dB when the signal generators output is turned on. You couldn't
> copy by ear a signal of that level except for the slowest of Morse
> keying and then it would be very hard going. The "old fashioned" signal
> level that gives a signal to noise ratio of 10 dB is more meaningful, as
> a 10 dB above the noise signal is a comfortable listening level that we
> can all equate to.
>
> I had done earlier A/B comparisons between the K3 and 480 where I didn't
> think there was a difference, I must have mistakenly not use the 480
> pre-amp...
>
> 73 Dave, G4AON
> K3/100 #80
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/K3-6m-pre-amp-tp16252928p16254955.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list