[Elecraft] G3SJX review in Radcom (RSGB)

[Bill Tippett]

GM3SEK wrote:
 >Those statements are incorrect in almost every detail.

         Just to clarify, you are referring to G4ILO and not
me.  I asked a question which G4ILO responded to.  In case
any misunderstood the message header, it was G4ILO's comments
which followed mine.  Sorry for being picky but I do not like
comments I didn't make attributed to me (even accidentally).

"G4ILO wrote:  <---Which means his comments followed my question
 >Bill W4ZV wrote:"

 >I don't know if Peter Hart has plans to review the K3 or not. But I do
know Peter, and I do know that his reviews have NEVER been influenced by
advertising considerations.

         I agree.  Peter has demonstrated the utmost integrity
in my readings of his many reviews, presentations, etc.

 >The RSGB advertising department may try to sell space opposite a review
that is about to be published, but that in no way affects the integrity
of what Peter has already written.

         Most publications worth reading (RadCom is one
of the very best) make a clear distinction between the
editorial department and advertising department.  Would
you even bother reading something that you felt was not
objective and had been "bought" with advertising?  I doubt
it.  Such publications would not be in business very long.

                                 73,  Bill  W4ZV