[Elecraft] K3 capabilities
Ron D'Eau Claire
ron at cobi.biz
Mon Jun 9 22:58:26 EDT 2008
If you read my message, you know that I agree with you.
Under it all is a person.
Y'know, my grandfather could hitch and drive a team of horses.
I can't.
Still, I get where I'm going. And I get there faster then he did.
We humans continue to develop better tools to accomplish our goals more
easily and quickly.
That was my first point.
I agree with you about humans in space. I don't know if it was some German
rocket scientist, but I've heard that argument many times. It's a good
argument.
I also know that a human is one of the most expensive and heavy (by the time
life support is included) "computers" to put in a spacecraft. So simple
economics dictates evaluating whether there's a decent chance a specific
mission can be done by something a lot cheaper and lighter.
The problem is that a computer can't do crazy, silly things that just might
shed light on something we never anticipated.
Having a human around who can say "Hey, what if I..." is important to
humankind, whether it's an Astronaut or a Ham.
That was my second point.
Ron AC7AC
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Harris [mailto:mike.harris at horizon.co.fk]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 4:58 PM
To: Ron D'Eau Claire; elecraft at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 capabilities
Hi,
Didn't some German rocket scientist say something to the effect that the
best computer to have on a space craft is a human?
Nice try, I go with G4ILO.
Regards,
Mike VP8NO
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list