[Elecraft] 1.8 or 2.1 kc Filter

Bill Maddock n4zi96 at yahoo.com
Fri Jul 11 18:30:22 EDT 2008


As a contestor and DXer taht has used 1.8 and 2.1 filters - I prefer the 2.1 - I had a kenwood 1.8 and it was just 2 tinny sounding. I have used cascaded 2.1 Inrads in my TS-850s and it was good enough - I have
a 6 khz the factory 2.7 khz and the 2.1 khz in my K3 - most the time
I run my bandwidth at 2.8 which is just above thw 2.7 and it uses the
6 khz + dsp the audio sounds much nicer - but that it for uncrowded bands
The 2.1 is tight and with the dsp it is just fine - when I crank down on the dsp bandwidth control I have to use the shift knob to get the audio to
sound better. I don't really think that you would like a 1.8 the 2.1 is tight enough! Hope this helps

73,

  Bill N4ZI  www.n4zi.net/Home.htm


--- On Fri, 7/11/08, Mike Miller <mmiller at nctc.com> wrote:

> From: Mike Miller <mmiller at nctc.com>
> Subject: [Elecraft] 1.8 or 2.1 kc Filter
> To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> Date: Friday, July 11, 2008, 2:51 PM
> Anyone have experience with 1.8 and 2.1 kc filters for the
> K3?
> Trying to decide which one to get..
> 
> I am a DXer exclusively......not a contester...
> work CW rarely....
> 
> 
> Does the audio from 1.8 sound too pinched....? 
> I just dont want to hear a 59+10 signal that is 3 kc..from
> the frequency I am listening on....
> 
> any thoughts? on what filters to get..
> 
> Mike Miller KA5SMA
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> 
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


      


More information about the Elecraft mailing list