[Elecraft] k3-broadcast band reception

[David Woolley]

G4ILO wrote:

> I think you're wrong about that, David. The message with the long lines that
> provoked this off-topic digression was not posted through Nabble. My post

Then why does it have a nabble message-ID?   Maybe there is more than 
one way of posting using nabble tools and only some do not obey the 
first part of the internet requirement "be correct in what you send; be 
tolerant in what you accept".

   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
   From: LarryMaguire at triad.rr.com
   Precedence: list
   Subject: [Elecraft] k3-broadcast band reception
   Cc:
   Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:34:34 -0800
   To: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
   Message-ID: <303395.81681199147674410.JavaMail.nabble at isper.nabble.com>
   Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
   MIME-Version: 1.0

> just now through Nabble appears properly wrapped when viewed through
> MailMan.

   Your headers don't mention JavaMail, so I suspect that is the problem 
tool, at least for nabble postings.

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.