[Elecraft] 2.7 vs 2.8 filter choice
jimbrass
jimbrass at bellsouth.net
Fri Apr 4 14:15:03 EST 2008
If one is a CW only operator, this is a non-issue. I ordered the 1 KHz, 400
Hz, and 250 Hz 8 pole filters as I fit in the CW only category. The 2.7 KHz
filter is the default and is fine with me.
All the Elecraft radios are marvelous CW machines. It is a wonder to me
that most of the comments (and criticisms) seen on this reflector are about
voice and digital issues.
73, Jim, K4ZMV
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Kopp" <k0pp at rfwave.net>
To: <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 3:01 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] 2.7 vs 2.8 filter choice
> Unless I've missed something along the way, it seems like the "concern"
> over which filter to choose comes down to a question of cost.
>
> Given the cost of a K3, the price difference between the two filters seems
> to be of little consequence. Is there a reason to prefer the 2.7 over a
> 2.8 -other-
> than cost? To me there wasn't.
> Yes, I realize some of us are more "thrifty" than others
> and perhaps this is the issue. If I have to ponder over
> whether to pay the difference between the 2.7 and the
> better 2.8 filter, then perhaps I shouldn't be buying the radio. The cost
> difference is a very small percentage
> of the overall cost.
>
> Ken Kopp - K0PP
> ElecraftCovers at rfwave.net
> or
> k0pp at arrl.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list