[Elecraft] bad choice: Anderson PowePole connectors
John Payne
paynej1 at embarqmail.com
Wed Jul 18 22:28:44 EDT 2007
See bottom post:
Phil Kane wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 03:44:08 +0000, Charles Harpole wrote:
>
>
>> ARRL's idea to standardize on Anderson is similarily a
>> mistake... and their idea is especially applied to emergency
>> comm... the very place where weird fixtures are another disaster.
>>
>
> Our ARES group has standardized on the Anderson PPs and they
> have been installed on all equipment used by our members.
I can't for the life of me understand the hatred some show of APPs.
Like any other connector, if installed PROPERLY and used for the
intended purpose, they do a great job. ANY connector can fail if
installed in a ham-handed manner, even the most expensive. My local
ARES group has standardized on these, and not just because "the ARRL
said so", as some imply. They truly are a superior connector if
installed to manufacturers spec. Crimp or solder, your choice, although
if crimping is good enough for NASA, Boeing, McDonnell-Douglas et al,
it's good enough for me.
Also, the roll pins are NOT recommended by most sellers of APPs, nor
Anderson. They do not stay put, and can cause a disaster if they fall
into the wrong place(see Murphy's Law). Better to use a drop of Super
Glue or similar after the connectors are dovetailed together. The clip
made to hold sets together is a great idea, although it does add to the
expense.
BTW, RC modelers use APPs extensively with no trouble or unwanted
disconnects, and this is certainly a harsher environment than most of us
will use them in.
Just my 2 cents, now back in my hole!!
73 de John AI4JH
--
"The real proof that there is intelligent life in outer space is that they haven't come here."
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list