[Elecraft] K2/100 (and other) Reviews Needed for eHam

[Jack Smith]

No doubt the ARRL is far from perfect, and the separation between the 
business side and editorial side of their businesses can be suspect.

However, note that even Consumer's Union, which does not accept 
advertising, has been forced to admit that some of their automotive 
testing procedures were tilted (no pun intended) to cause SUV rollover 
by incorrect methodology, if I recall correctly. And, more recently, 
they had to withdraw comparisons of child restraint seats due to 
incorrect test protocols. NBC news did not get adequate results in their 
side impact piece, so they rigged the vehicle to ignite upon collision 
with some sort of igniter mechanism.

Jack

David Wilburn wrote:
> There are some issues with the ARRL reviews also.  They seem to be 
> very hesitant about saying anything much negative about rigs from the 
> big boys, but do not hesitate to call a smaller business out on issues.
>
> The way they test is not always indicative of real world usage, as 
> highlighted in Tadeusz Raczek's, SP7HT, article "The DX Prowess of HF 
> Receivers" on the Elecraft website.
>
> David Wilburn
> dave.wilburn at verizon.net
>
>
>
> Jack Smith wrote:
>> In addition, a subjective review hits things that the manufacturer's 
>> specs can't cover, such as:
>>
>> - Ergonomics of control, menus, etc.
>> - For a kit, how difficult is it to build, how good are the instructions
>> - How is the manufacturer to deal with, should there be a problem
>> - How do the specifications translate into usable features and 
>> performance
>>
>> A more thorough review, such as that conducted by the ARRL, can 
>> verify the claimed specifications. Those detailed reviews are, 
>> unfortunately, difficult for the average ham to conduct, as they 
>> require specialized test equipment and fair bit of experience to 
>> interpret the results correctly.
>>
>> I also think that a negative review that is a  rant without reason is 
>> appropriately discounted by the readers, compared with a negative 
>> review that cites specific faults or dislikes.
>>
>> In  the interest of disclosure, I'm also the seller of a panadapter 
>> kit that is purchased about 95% by K2 owners, although it was not 
>> originally aimed at that market. I have one review of the Z90 on 
>> Eham.com under Third Party Equipment rating it a 5/5.
>>
>> Jack K8ZOA
>> www.cliftonlaboratories.com
>>
>>
>>
>> Larry Phipps wrote:
>>> I assure you it is! I market a digital wattmeter kit and almost 
>>> every customer I poll says that eHam.net reviews were either the 
>>> source of their initial exposure to my kit, or the deciding factor 
>>> in purchasing. Some visit the site regularly looking for products 
>>> with a rating of 5.0 or close and a large number of reviews, while 
>>> some go there to verify performance claims, which may seem hard to 
>>> believe otherwise in my case. Either way, it's by far my best 
>>> marketing tool followed by comments on reflectors and word of mouth 
>>> OTA, at club meetings, etc... all basically someone's opinion. I 
>>> suspect it's the same with Elecraft.
>>>
>>> In other words, an impartial third party opinion counts more than a 
>>> manufacturer's claims.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>> Larry N8LP
>>> www.telepostinc.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Wyn Hughes wrote:
>>>> A little marketing is good and well deserved for the Elecraft line 
>>>> up in general, but I do wonder who with any average intelligence 
>>>> would rely on a purely personal or subjective view. Marketing execs 
>>>> tell us that people do listen to this kind of stuff, but do we? Is 
>>>> this stuff worth powder and shot?
>>>>
>>>> Anyhow, like Drake gear, all Elecraft stuff is by definition 
>>>> "great", so who are we to argue or cause dissention among the foot 
>>>> soldiers or centurions?
>>>>
>>>> Best for the Lunar New Year to all
>>>> Wyn, VR2AX
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>>> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>>>> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
>>>> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>>>>  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   Help: 
>>>> http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>>>> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>>> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
>>> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   Help: 
>>> http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>>> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
>> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   Help: 
>> http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>