[Elecraft] K3 Question

[Terry Conboy]

At 11:41 AM 2007-08-23, Don Rasmussen wrote:
>Assume a non-contester is looking at a K3.
>
>There would be no need for a second receiver nor the
>absolute selectivity of the K3. Aside from those
>points, can anyone suggest how the K3 might compare to
>the Kenwood TS870?

If you operate 160m or SWL in the tropical bands, the phase-locked 
dual receiver in the K3 could be beneficial for diversity (binaural) 
weak-signal reception using two separate antennas.

73, Terry N6RY